Orca Crypto
Mining and staking

Mining and staking

Two answers to one question, and every argument about them is really about tradeoffs.

2Consensus models
99%Energy cut when Ethereum switched
32ETH per validator
5Guides
The problem being solved

Who gets to write the next page?

A blockchain is maintained by thousands of computers that do not know or trust each other. Something has to decide which one adds the next block, in a way that cannot be gamed.

Both answers work the same way underneath: make cheating cost more than it could ever earn. They just use different currencies for that cost.

Proof of work spends electricity. Proof of stake puts capital at risk. Everything else about the two systems follows from that one choice.

Worth remembering
Neither is objectively better. They optimize for different things, and the arguments between their supporters are usually about which tradeoffs matter, not about facts.
Side by side

The differences that actually matter

Proof of workProof of stake
Security comes fromElectricity and hardware spentCapital locked and at risk
To attack you needMore computing power than everyone elseA very large share of the token supply
Energy useHigh and deliberateNegligible by comparison
Barrier to participateSpecialized hardware and cheap powerTokens, sometimes a large minimum
Punishment for cheatingWasted electricitySlashed stake, permanently destroyed
Issuance goes toMinersValidators and their delegators
Used byBitcoin, Litecoin, Monero, DogecoinEthereum, Solana, Cardano, Avalanche, most newer chains

Thinking about staking?

It looks like a savings account and it is not one. We go through lockups, slashing, validator selection and what actually happens if you need the funds back sooner than planned.